- Who We Are
- The SightSound Platform
- In The News
VARIETY – By Paul Sweeting
WASHINGTON — In a twist that could put a kink in studio and record company online plans, a federal magistrate in Pennsylvania has ruled that patents held by SightSound Technologies for distributing audio and video files over telecommunications networks covers Internet distribution.buy valium online
The ruling, in a suit brought by SightSound against CDNow, means that the online music distributors MusicNet and Pressplay are now vulnerable to patent infringement suits from SightSound for offering paid downloads over the Internet.ultram for sale
Online video-on-demand providers Movielink and Movies.com could also be vulnerable.buy tramadol without prescription
“This is an important step forward in the aggressive enforcement of our patent rights,” SightSound president and CEO Scott Sander said.buy tramadol without prescription
The suit dates to 1998, when SightSound charged CDNow with infringing SightSound’s patents on selling digital audio and video files over telecommunications networks.adderall for sale
CDNow (now owned by Bertelsmann Entertainment) argued that the “telecommunications networks” referred to in the patents did not cover the Internet and, therefore, it could not be sued for infringement.valium online no prescription
Chief Magistrate Judge Kenneth Benson of the U.S. District Court for western Pennsylvania disagreed with that interpretation, finding that SightSound’s patents cover the Internet.buy xanax online without prescription
Ruling opens the way for the case to go to trial and leaves Bertelsmann open to potential damages if the trial court finds that the patents were infringed.valium online no prescription
A Bertelsmann spokeswoman said the company does not comment on pending litigation.xanax online without prescription
The patents at issue were originally filed in 1988 by SightSound chairman and co-founder Arthur Hair and were issued in 1993.
Pre-Web originbuy valium online no prescription
In those pre-Web days, the patents described a method for transferring digital audio and video files from the memory of one computer to the memory of a second, remote computer over “telecommunications networks” and collecting an electronic payment in return.buy xanax no prescription
In patent cases, a separate proceeding is often held before the trial to determine the scope of the patents and whether the language in the patent is applicable to the challenged activity. In arguing that the language in the 1988 patents did not apply to paid downloads over the Internet, Bertelsmann was hoping to head the case off before going to trial and facing possible liability.
In its ruling, however, the court wrote that “the terms ‘telecommunications line’ … should not be interpreted as excluding the Internet.”
Although the case was brought against CDNow, SightSound officials believe the patents, as interpreted by the court, would cover the online plans of all record companies, as well as the studios.
Company has sent letters to both MusicNet and Pressplay, informing them of SightSound’s patent claims.
Despite the lawsuit, SightSound says it’s not an enemy of Hollywood.
“We’ve been extending an olive branch to Hollywood for years now, trying to persuade them that we can do it for them faster, better and cheaper than they can do it themselves,” Sander said. “We stand ready to work with all copyright owners, not against them.”
SightSound operates its own paid movie and music download service through its Web site sightsound.com.